Stayed home to raise the kids? Here's what that means legally.
In England and Wales, raising children and running a home is treated as an equal contribution to earning a salary. The law — Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 — does not reward the higher earner. It looks at the needs of both parties and the contributions each made to the marriage, financial or otherwise. Read on to understand exactly how courts decide what is fair.
The legal framework: section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
When a court considers a financial settlement in divorce, it applies the factors set out in section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. These have not changed with the introduction of no-fault divorce — the no-fault reform affected only the grounds for divorce, not the principles used to divide financial assets.
The court's overriding objective is to achieve a fair outcome. There is no fixed formula. The same assets can produce very different outcomes depending on the specific circumstances of the couple — particularly their respective needs.
The section 25 factors: what courts consider
Financial resources and needs
The income, earning capacity, property, and financial resources each party has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future — and their financial needs and obligations.
Standard of living
The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage.
Age and length of marriage
The age of each party and the duration of the marriage. Short marriages generally attract less sharing of assets; long marriages tend towards equal division.
Disability or health
Any physical or mental disability of either party that affects earning capacity or financial needs.
Contributions to the marriage
The contributions made by each party — financial and non-financial. Caring for children and the home is treated as an equal contribution to earning income.
Conduct
Conduct is only relevant if it would be inequitable to disregard it. Courts rarely take conduct into account — financial misconduct such as dissipating assets is more likely to be considered than marital misconduct.
Loss of future benefits
The value of any benefit — such as a pension — that either party will lose as a result of the divorce.
Children's welfare
The welfare of any minor children of the family is the first consideration — their housing and financial security takes priority over the division of assets between the adults.
Courts apply the section 25 factors as a whole — no single factor determines the outcome, and needs always come first.
Does 50/50 apply in England and Wales?
Equal division — 50/50 — is the starting point for long marriages where both parties have broadly equal needs. It is not an automatic entitlement and it is not always the outcome. Courts use the equal division principle as a yardstick and then adjust based on the section 25 factors.
In practice, the longer the marriage and the more intertwined the finances, the closer to 50/50 the outcome tends to be. For shorter marriages, pre-marital assets, or cases where one party has significantly greater needs, the split may be very different.
What counts as a matrimonial asset?
Not all assets are treated equally. Courts distinguish between matrimonial assets — built up during the marriage — and non-matrimonial assets, which typically include:
- Assets owned before the marriage and kept separate throughout
- Inheritances received by one party before or during the marriage, kept separate
- Gifts from third parties to one party personally
Non-matrimonial assets are not automatically excluded from a settlement — needs can override this distinction. But they carry less weight in the sharing exercise than assets built up jointly during the marriage.
Does conduct affect the settlement?
Almost never in the way people expect. Courts in England and Wales take a deliberately non-judgmental approach to marital conduct — adultery, unreasonable behaviour, or the reasons for the marriage breakdown do not generally affect the financial outcome. This approach was not introduced by no-fault divorce; it predates it.
What can affect the outcome is financial conduct: dissipating assets before or during proceedings, hiding assets, making large unexplained gifts to third parties, or failing to comply with financial disclosure obligations. Courts can add back dissipated assets or draw adverse inferences.
| Type of conduct | Effect on financial settlement |
|---|---|
| Adultery or relationship breakdown | Generally none — courts do not punish marital fault financially |
| Domestic abuse (financial or physical) | Can be relevant to needs assessment; seek specialist advice |
| Dissipating assets before proceedings | Court can add back dissipated sum and adjust settlement accordingly |
| Hiding assets / non-disclosure on Form E | Adverse inference; potential to reopen settlement even after order made |
| Wasteful litigation / non-compliance with orders | Costs orders against the non-compliant party |
Short marriage vs long marriage: does it matter?
Yes, significantly. For very short marriages with no children and limited financial entanglement, courts are more likely to look at what each party brought into the marriage and aim to put them back in broadly the same position. For long marriages where finances have been shared for decades, equal division of all assets is the more likely starting point.
There is no fixed definition of a "short" or "long" marriage. Courts look at the whole picture — including any period of cohabitation before marriage in appropriate cases.
Understand your financial position
DivorceCompanion's route checker identifies your situation and guides you through the right financial process — whether that is a consent order or full financial remedy proceedings.
- ✓ Route checker: which process applies?
- ✓ Stage tracker: every step explained
- ✓ Form E Builder for contested proceedings